• Archives

  • Recent Posts

  • Former Facebook for iPhone Developer Joe Hewitt Says iPad “Everything He’s Been Wishing For”

    App Store Apps, News, development, facebook, iPhone, ipad, joe hewitt | Thursday January 28 2010 8:31 pm | Comments Off

    Facebook for iPad

    Joe Hewitt, who developed the awesome Facebook 3.0, but controversially (and some would say detrimentally) left the iPhone platform before Facebook 3.1 over the App Store review process, has come out extremely positively about the iPad:

    iPad is exactly the product I’ve been wishing for ever since I wrapped my mind around the iPhone and its constraints. While the rumor mill was churning with all kinds of crazy possibilities for the Apple tablet, I mostly rolled my eyes, because I felt strongly that all Apple needed to do to revolutionize computing was simply to make an iPhone with a large screen. Anyone who feels underwhelmed by that doesn’t understand how much of the iPhone OS’s potential is still untapped.

    Hewitt claims the biggest constraint he had in making the ultimate Facebook app was screen size, and the iPad removes that completely. As to the “closed” nature of the iPhone as a platform?

    The one thing that makes an iPhone/iPad app “closed” is that it lives in a sandbox, which means it can’t just read and write willy-nilly to the file system, access hardware, or interfere with other apps. In my mind, this is one of the best features of the OS. It makes native apps more like web apps, which are similarly sandboxed, and therefore much more secure. On Macs and PCs, you have to re-install the OS every couple years or so just to undo the damage done by apps, but iPhone OS is completely immune to this.

    But what about his concerns over Apple’s role as iPhone — and now iPad — gatekeeper? Web apps is how he sees working around Apple. Anyone can make anything they want for the iPad, provided they’re willing to run it on their own server and not gunk up the end-users machine. That, Hewitt says, is the key to total client-side freedom.

    So here’s hoping the platform gets Hewitt back, if not for Facebook 3.2 or 4.0 for the iPad, then for something equally as impressive…

    [Thanks to Fassy for the tip!]

    This is a story by the iPhone Blog. This feed is sponsored by The iPhone Blog Store.

    Former Facebook for iPhone Developer Joe Hewitt Says iPad “Everything He’s Been Wishing For”


    iPad Uses Micro-SIM for 3G. What is it and Will the 4th Gen iPhone Get It?

    4th gen iphone, News, iPhone, ipad, micro-sim | Thursday January 28 2010 8:13 pm | Comments Off

    365px-GSM_Micro_SIM_Card_vs._GSM_Mini_Sim_Card.svg

    The 3G version of the iPad is unlocked, so if your carrier supports micro-SIM, it should “just work”. Wait… what? Steve Jobs dropped the micro-SIM comment so matter-of-factly during the iPad introduction that it took us a moment to process — Micro-SIM, aka 3FF or 3rd generation SIM card. Yeah, don’t have one of those, and neither does any iPhone. Awkward…!

    PCMag’s Sacha Seagan fills us in:

    3FF SIMs were developed by the European Telecommunications Standards Institute to fit into devices too small for a regular SIM. Where a regular SIM measures 15 millimeters x 25 mm, a 3FF SIM card measures 12mm x 15mm.

    Today’s “regular” or mini-SIM is the 2FF, much smaller than the credit card-sized SIM that was generation one, and the 3FF is teensy-tinier still. Sure, no one in North America uses them yet, but T-Mobile is getting them, AT&T is obviously getting them since they’re supporting the iPad with data plans, and we’re guessing over the next 3-6 months, more carriers will get on board too. (Engadget is saying the pipeline is set for Orange and O2).

    And the reason why Apple went with the Micro-SIM in the iPad? Could be they needed to save space in a device already twice the size of an iPhone. Could be it’s just Apple being kill-the-floppy-drop-firewire-Apple. If that’s the case, it’s quite possible the 4th gen iPhone will get it next, and then what would Apple do with all that extra space?

    This is a story by the iPhone Blog. This feed is sponsored by The iPhone Blog Store.

    iPad Uses Micro-SIM for 3G. What is it and Will the 4th Gen iPhone Get It?


    Fring and iCall Announce Support for VoIP Over 3G

    App News, News, fring, fringland Ltd, iCall, iCall, Inc, iPhone, skype, social networking | Thursday January 28 2010 8:11 pm | Comments Off
    icall.jpg

    Now that Apple has lifted restrictions on 3G VoIP calls, Fringland has just released a 3G-enabled version of Fring for iPhone [App Store, Free]. The new application works just as it did before, only now you can perform voice and video calls over cellular data networks in addition to Wi-Fi. And yes, Skype calls go through using Fring over 3G as well.

    Fing isn't the only one jumping onto the 3G VoIP bandwagon. iCall has also announced that iCall Free VoIP [App Store, Free] now works over 3G as well. For those who don't know, iCall allows you to transfer any incoming call to VoIP for free for pay, allowing you to save your minutes. Check out their website for more info.


    Critical Mass: Online Pundits Weigh In On The iPad (humor)

    Fun Stuff, News, apple tablet, iPhone, ipad, ipad sucks | Thursday January 28 2010 7:51 pm | Comments Off
    Eychasketchvsipad

    Next Generation Online decided to take a tip from the Rotten Tomatoes film-review aggregater site and poll the Interwebs for critical consensus of the new iPad, either yea or nay.  They quote from some of the Usual Suspects (Mashable, Techradar, Yahoo Tech -- but not iSmashPhone, dammit!) and pretty much concur that, in its v1.0 incarnation, the new tablet is more sizzle than steak :-)

    Frankly, all you need to know is the above checklist comparing the iPad to an Etch-a-Sketch.  And we'll bet that before the year's out, Etch-a-Sketch will proudly proclaim their version 2.0, with Flash and SD card support.


    Netflix Says They Won’t Be Streaming Movies to The iPad Any Time Soon

    Netflix, News, iPhone, ipad | Thursday January 28 2010 7:02 pm | Comments Off
    netflix.jpg

    During Netflix's quarterly financial conference call yesterday, CEO Reed Hastings stated that they have no intention of creating a Netflix streaming app for the iPad, now or in the near future. According to Hastings, Netflix is spending most of their time focusing on "larger screens," and that an iPhone or iPad app is something they'd "get around to" once they've become ubiquitous in other areas.

    "We haven't yet done or submitted an iPhone application," Hasting's said. "We're optimistic that ... it could be approved but there's no way of really knowing in advance what Apple's stance would be on that. Of course, that application, if it works on the iPhone would work on the iPad."


    Fujitsu Says iPad Name Is Theirs

    News, fujitsu, iPhone, ipad | Thursday January 28 2010 4:42 pm | Comments Off
    fujitsuipad-lg.jpg

    Fujitsu's head of PR, Masahiro Yamane, says that Apple does not own the rights to the trademark for the iPad name, but that Fujitsu has owned that trademark since 2003 for mobile communicator devices. The only problem with that is that Fujitsu lost that trademark in the spring, but that isn't stopping them from asserting their ownership publicly.

    "It’s our understanding that the name is ours," Yamane told the New York Times.


    Unlocked iPad Doesn’t Work On T-Mobile 3G

    News, att, iPhone, ipad | Thursday January 28 2010 4:13 pm | Comments Off
    apple-ipad-tablet-steve-jobsjpg-fd9049ca2d6b3208_large.jpg

    As Steve Jobs announced at yesterday's keynote, the 3G model of the iPad will be unlocked, but that doesn't mean AT&T won't still be the exclusive carrier. The device will be GSM-only, so Verizon and Sprint are obviously out of the picture. While it will be possible to use the device on T-Mobile's network since the device is unlocked, so some will undoubtedly sign their iPad up with them, most people probably won't want to.


    iPad SDK allows you to take photos and other insights

    News, app store, apple, code, engadget, iPhone, ipad, iphone apps, platform, sdk | Thursday January 28 2010 4:00 pm | Comments Off

    Filed under: , , ,

    Turns out a camera in the iPad may have been closer than we thought -- Engadget has been diving into the SDK released yesterday (NDAs be darned, I guess?) and discovered that the ability to "Take Photo" is still hidden in the iPad's code. Of course, the device doesn't actually have a camera, but the fact that there's code written for one could mean that prototypes of the device did have a camera, and/or that we'll eventually see one in a future revision.

    There's a few other interesting things sneaking out of the SDK as well, including the fact that "popovers" (those windows and menus that were popping up in the video yesterday) are listed in Human Interface Guidelines as iPad-only flair. That would make designing for the two platforms pretty different -- while it's certainly possible, as we learned yesterday, to run iPhone apps on the new platform, it seems like Apple is telling developers that iPad apps will have a very different feel than their smaller predecessor's versions. A year from now, the two platforms may end up being different markets entirely.

    Update: The "touch to return to the call" bar made the trip to the iPad, too. Makes it more likely that this is just vestigial code.

    iPad SDK allows you to take photos and other insights originally appeared on The Unofficial Apple Weblog (TUAW) on Thu, 28 Jan 2010 18:00:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

    The Unofficial Apple Weblog (TUAW)iPad SDK allows you to take photos and other insights originally appeared on The Unofficial Apple Weblog (TUAW) on Thu, 28 Jan 2010 18:00:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

    Read | Permalink | Email this | Comments

    Adobe Responds To iPad’s Lack Of Flash

    News, adobe flash, iPhone, ipad | Thursday January 28 2010 3:30 pm | Comments Off
    nullplugin.png

    With so many similarities to the iPhone and iPod touch (the OS kernel being one of them), it was no surprise that the device doesn't support Adobe Flash. Still, now that Apple has expanded the products with that limitation to include a tablet, some think Apple is pushing their anti-Flash agenda a little too far. Adobe is understandably one of them, and they have issued a public response announcing that they intend to fight Apple's unofficial boycott.


    iPad Impressions from People Who’ve Actually Used It

    Editorial, News, iPhone, ipad, pundit, roundup | Thursday January 28 2010 3:27 pm | Comments Off

    Steve Jobs with iPad on Chair

    Like many things Apple, the iPad launch has galvanized those who believe it’s the “next big thing” from those who believe it’s the “latest stink” — but what about those who, you know, have actually spent time using the thing, and now had a chance to ponder it a bit?

    Sure, some are no doubt Apple enthusiasts easily impressed, while others are jaded journalists almost impossible to impress. For a mix of both, follow on after the break.

    Daring Fireball’s John Gruber has two long posts up about the iPad, and wins the cleverest analogy award hands-down, comparing the Mac to manual and the iPad to automatic transmissions.

    Car enthusiasts (and genuine experts like race car drivers) still drive cars with manual transmissions. They offer more control; they’re more efficient. But the vast majority of cars sold today are automatics. So too it’ll be with computers. Eventually, the vast majority will be like the iPad in terms of the degree to which the underlying computer is abstracted away. Manual computers, like the Mac and Windows PCs, will slowly shift from the standard to the niche, something of interest only to experts and enthusiasts and developers.

    British actor and tech enthusiast Steven Fry also spent time with the iPad and came away positively giddy because of its simplicity and Apple’s perfectionist tendencies towards product development. He also called the iPhone a “100,000 volt taser shot up the jacksie” (whatever that is) to the Nokia, Samsung, Palm, and Blackberrys of the world, so we’re predisposed to heart him:

    There are many issues you could have with the iPad. No multitasking, still no Flash. No camera, no GPS. They all fall away the minute you use it. I cannot emphasise enough this point: “Hold your judgment until you’ve spent five minutes with it”. No YouTube film, no promotional video, no keynote address, no list of features can even hint at the extraordinary feeling you get from actually using and interacting with one of these magical objects. You know how everyone who has ever done Who Wants To Be A Millionaire? always says, “It’s not the same when you’re actually here. So different from when you’re sitting at home watching.”? You know how often you’ve heard that? Well, you’ll hear the same from anyone who’s handled an iPad. The moment you experience it in your hands you know this is class. This is a different order of experience. The speed, the responsiveness, the smooth glide of it, the richness and detail of the display, the heft in your hand, the rightness of the actions and gestures that you employ, untutored and instinctively, it’s not just a scaled up iPhone or a scaled-down multitouch enhanced laptop – it is a whole new kind of device. And it will change so much. Newspapers, magazines, literature, academic text books, brochures, fliers and pamphlets are going to be transformed (poor Kindle). Specific dedicated apps and enhancements will amaze us.

    Engadget editor-in-chief, Josh Topolsky, however, thinks Apple hasn’t told a compelling, must-buy story for the iPad (yet?):

    There’s no question that much of what the iPhone and iPod touch do translates nicely here, and there’s no question that some of the tweaks made to native iPad apps are impressive, but nothing I saw made me sit up and think, “Wow, I need this.” It’s telling that the most intriguing user experiences shown off today were the iPad versions of the iWork suite. iWork? If Steve Jobs hoped to answer the question about why we need this third device, or how it’s better than a netbook, he didn’t make a compelling case. Where is video chat? Where is multitasking (honestly, only one app at a time for a device of this size and speed)? Why is the lock screen so embarrassingly empty? Why are there no active widgets to fill that huge homescreen space? Where is the expansion of the multitouch user experience? And seriously, where are the media partnerships?

    iLounge’s Jeremy Horowitz thinks many of us missed the “Minority Report” moment:

    Apple didn’t bring flashy demos. It dropped the ball on a few arguably trivial parts of the UI and didn’t bring any really showy software to the event; rather, it focused almost entirely on updates to old apps. The biggest hint of what the iPad will enable was a two-second reference in the N.O.V.A. demo to opening airlocks by putting your fingers on the screen and turning the door handle. It was shown, and if you knew what it was—basically, Metroid Prime using your fingers rather than a Wii controller—you realized what this meant for games, and for other apps on the iPad. This is just not possible on the little iPhone screen unless you have baby fingers.

    Mobile analyst Michael Gartenberg, writing for SlashGear, thinks the iPad is neither an iPod touch nor a MacBook:

    The form factor is excellent. It’s not too light to feel fragile and, at 1.5 lbs, it’s also not something that’s going to tire you holding it long term. The screen is amazing with a full XGA resolution. I could easily imagine reading for hours on end on this screen and far prefer this idea to e-ink. For one, there’s no annoying refresh that happens with every page turn and, as a backlit display, it’s perfect for reading in dark places, like airplane seats or in bed without disturbing anyone else. The performance of Apple’s silicon is wicked fast. I was pretty skeptical about running existing apps in a pixel-doubled full screen mode. Action games, I figured, would be pretty much out of the question and Apple came fully prepared to answer that question. Existing games ran ridiculously fast and titles optimized for the device make this the ultimate mobile game device. Personally, I’d buy it just for gaming alone.

    So it’s sounding like, if some aren’t convinced about the utility or place of an iPad in the greater computing ecosystem, most who’ve actually used the hardware have come away impressed. Again, these aren’t mainstream opinions — strictly inside baseball here — so it will be interested to see how people take to it when they can start walking into their local Apple store and trying it out.

    When that happens, will the iPod touch have to duke it out for buyer attention?

    This is a story by the iPhone Blog. This feed is sponsored by The iPhone Blog Store.

    iPad Impressions from People Who’ve Actually Used It


    Next Page »